Tsar Alexander II. Public domain. |
Alexander II (1855-81): the 'Tsar Liberator'
Alexander Nikolayevich succeeded his father during the Crimean war and the first year of his reign was taken up with military affairs. His foreign policy was, in many respects, a continuation of his father's - to suppress Polish nationalism and expand into the declining Ottoman Empire - but after the fall of Sevastopol this ambition had to be put on hold. He had to negotiate for peace, and the terms of the resulting treaty were unfavourable to Russia. The defeat impressed him with a profound conviction that the country needed to modernise and reform. Alexander's reign saw a dramatic expansion of Russia's railway network. Defeat in the Crimea exposed Russia’s lack of a railway network, with the only major line being the link between St Petersburg and Moscow (450 miles). In 1853 there were just 620 miles of railway, by 1866 there were 3,000 miles and by 1877 the mileage had trebled. The railways served a dual military and economic purpose. They enabled men and military hardware to be delivered to the field of conflict and they speeded up the transport of goods.
The emancipation of the serfs: In March 1856 he told the nobility of Moscow,
The emancipation settlement, proclaimed on 19 February (3 March NS) 1861, was therefore a compromise, but one particularly aimed at winning over the landlords.
This meant that emancipation was not, in practice, a good deal for the peasants.
Emancipation therefore fell short of the hopes of the idealists, leaving many peasants economically worse off than when they had been serfs.
Further reforms: Other measures followed the emancipation. Local assemblies (zemstva) were introduced in 1864. They were elected by the nobility, urban dwellers and peasants under a voting system based on property qualification. The zemstva were empowered to levy taxes and to spend their funds on schools, public health, roads, and other social services. This meant the creation of new posts that were filled by professional people. More than half were teachers, who presided over a remarkable expansion of primary education. The remainder were largely medical professionals and administrators. On the other hand, local government lacked the powers and finance it needed to do its job properly.
The emancipation of the serfs: In March 1856 he told the nobility of Moscow,
it is better to abolish serfdom from above than to wait until the serfs begin to liberate themselves from below.However, the bulk of the landowning class was determined to give the freed peasants as little as possible.
The emancipation settlement, proclaimed on 19 February (3 March NS) 1861, was therefore a compromise, but one particularly aimed at winning over the landlords.
- Peasants were granted their existing allotments and no longer owed labour duties or services. Legally, they were now free.
- The government compensated the landlords by paying them eighty per cent of the capital value of the land they were surrendering to the peasants. The peasants then had to pay twenty per cent of the capital value of their allotments to the landlord and the rest to the state over a period of forty-nine years.
This meant that emancipation was not, in practice, a good deal for the peasants.
- From 1863, they were bound to 'temporary obligation', which meant that they had to continue providing their old dues and services until they had redeemed the value of their allotments. This could take many years.
- On the other hand, if they wished to be free of these obligations, they could receive 'beggars' holdings', which were very small and often less than the land they had had for their own use when they were serfs. Only half a million peasants, or five per cent of the total peasant population, most of them from the fertile 'black earth' provinces of the south, accepted this offer, and many of those who did so were forced to return to the estates of the landowners in search of paid labour.
Emancipation therefore fell short of the hopes of the idealists, leaving many peasants economically worse off than when they had been serfs.
Grigory Myasoyedov, Peasants Reading the Emancipation Manifesto (1873) Public domain. |
Further reforms: Other measures followed the emancipation. Local assemblies (zemstva) were introduced in 1864. They were elected by the nobility, urban dwellers and peasants under a voting system based on property qualification. The zemstva were empowered to levy taxes and to spend their funds on schools, public health, roads, and other social services. This meant the creation of new posts that were filled by professional people. More than half were teachers, who presided over a remarkable expansion of primary education. The remainder were largely medical professionals and administrators. On the other hand, local government lacked the powers and finance it needed to do its job properly.